The $20,000,000 Non-Compete


If you were a kid in the 70’s, you’ll remember a TV show called The Six Million Dollar Man. It was about a man who was rebuilt with bionic implants that let him achieve incredible feats and protect the United States from the Commies. Plus, there was also a really cool sound effect when he jumped!

Recently, I heard another cool story about The Twenty Million Dollar Non-Compete. It’s about how a non-compete clause can achieve incredible feats and protect your business from rogue employees. (I binge-watched the entire thing!)

I am a huge proponent of every employer having an employment agreement with all key employees that includes, among other provisions, “restrictive covenants.” Restrictive covenants include non-compete agreements that prohibit employees from competing against your business, as well as other restrictions that prohibit employees from stealing your customers, employees, vendors, and confidential information (e.g. customer list).


These protections are all critically important when your business is based on customer relationships, on information about customers, and on specialized industry expertise.

B&B v. AP

One industry in that is built on customer relationships and business expertise is the insurance business.

Brown & Brown (B&B) is a large insurance agency with 180 offices throughout the U.S., including Daytona Beach and Orlando. To protect its relationship with customers, it has its producers enter employment agreements that contain restrictive covenants. And those covenants extend two years after employment.

AssuredPartners (AP) is a competing insurance agency formed by former B&B executives. According to B&B, in 2016, AP began picking off key producers in the B&B Daytona Beach and Orlando offices who had nursing home and habitational insurance expertise, as well as relationships with B&B customers, and AP knew these employees were subject to non-compete agreements.

B&B claimed that within weeks of the employees moving to AP, these former B&B employees began soliciting B&B customers, and B&B began receiving notices to transfer customer accounts to AP. B&B, then, filed injunctions and sued for damages both against the former employees based on their employment agreements and against AP for “tortious interference” with those employment agreements.


In March 2017, AP settled out of court and agreed to pay B&B $20,000,000 and to an injunction preventing it from hiring B&B employees.

It is important to emphasize that the $20MM payment was a settlement, not a judgment. AP voluntarily agreed to pay that amount rather than face the outcome of a trial. Not only is $20MM an extremely large sum in a non-compete case in general, it is a shockingly large sum for a settlement payment in a non-compete case.

What should we take away from this incident? The monetary aspects stand out, of course, but had there not been a valid non-compete agreement, B&B would have little or no likelihood of stopping the raid of its employees.

The key takeaways for your business from this epic struggle between B&B and AP are:

  • Follow F.S. 542.335: To be enforceable in Florida, non-competes and other restrictive covenants must comply with the Florida statute. If they are properly prepared, restrictive covenant agreements are fully enforceable and a valid means to protect the investment you’ve made in customer relationships, employee training, and confidential information.
  • Get It Signed: Each key employee should have a signed employment agreement that contains properly written restrictive covenants.
  • Watch Your Back: The restrictive covenant agreement should also contain a provision where the employee states that he or she is not subject to a non-compete with a former employer. This will help protect your business from claims for tortious interference when you had no idea about the newly-hired employee’s prior agreement.
  • Speedy Prosecution: If a competitor poaches an employee who is subject to restrictive covenants, you must promptly notify the new employer of the covenants to protect your customer relationships and business’ confidential information.
  • Consistent Enforcement: If you must enforce a restrictive covenant, you have to act diligently. Failing to do so could result in being unable to enforce the agreement.

Though it is unlikely an employee non-compete will get you millions of dollars, it will protect your business from rogue employees stealing valuable relationships and information that you’ve invested money to create.

Good Contracts Are Just Good Business

The business world is permeated by contracts. Poorly written contracts can cost a business hundreds of thousands of dollars. Understanding some of the basics about business contracts will help you grow and protect your business.

Request a free copy of our handbook!

Let Us Help You Protect Your Business!

Here at Alexander Abramson, we focus exclusively on business-related legal matters. Our attorneys have advised business owners and entrepreneurs for decades on all their commercial contract needs. We can help you define the necessary terms of a commercial relationship and ensure that those terms are included in a well-written contract that all parties understand.

We would love to speak with you directly about how we can help you increase and protect the value of your business. Call us at 407-649-7777 or email a team member to get started.

Scroll to Top